Can wholesale aluminum cans save costs for your production line?

Purchasing in bulk of wholesale cans of aluminum can immediately lower raw material costs. For instance, Bang Energy, an American Energy drink brand, has lowered the unit price from $0.12 to $0.08 by doing a deal with an annual purchase quantity of 150 million units, saving $6 million each year and raising the marginal profit margin by 9%. According to a McKinsey study, with each successive one million orders, the price per unit goes down by 3.5% to 5%. A major player like Coca-Cola has kept the procurement cost of aluminum cans at less than 12% of the total cost of production through centralized procurement strategies (industry average is 18%). In terms of supply chain efficiency, since consolidating three wholesale aluminum cans suppliers in 2021, Yanki Forest shortened the order delivery period from 45 days to 20 days, increased the inventory turnover ratio to an average of 9 times a year (industry standard is 6.2 times), and reduced the warehousing cost by 28%.

The synergy effect on manufacturing is significant. Anheuser-busch InBev’s filling plant in Mexico uses standardized 330-milliliter aluminum cans (13 grams weight, 90 psi compressive strength). A bulk purchasing system achieves a 95% reuse rate for molds. The changeover time for each production line reduces from 45 minutes to 8 minutes, and the production increase yearly is 120 million cans. Besides, massive procurement facilitates tailored coating technologies (e.g., 3-micron epoxy resin), which lengthens the shelf life of drinks from 18 months to 24 months and lowers the damage rate by 15%. For example, Suntory of Japan. In 2022, 70% of wholesale aluminum cans that it purchased adopted lightweight design (each can weighing 10 grams), reducing the energy consumption of the production line by 12% and saving more than 2 million US dollars in annual electricity fees.

Policy and tax optimization even enhances the cost advantage. According to the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), the imported carbon in cans of aluminum will be 8-12 euros per ton as of 2026, while locally produced recycled cans of aluminum from Trivium Packaging with a carbon level of 0.8 tons of CO₂ per ton may be exempt from such costs. The Inflation Reduction Act in the United States provides a $45-per-ton tax credit on local purchases. Of the $0.06 per low-cost aluminum can customized by Ball Corporation for PepsiCo, policy subsidies subsidize around 7% of the cost. Countries in the developing world such as India offer a 15% price subsidy to companies purchasing domestic aluminum cans under the “Production-Related Incentive Scheme” (PLI). Unilever has thus increased the localization level of its production lines to 80% and reduced the overall procurement cost by 19%.

Technological innovation is closely tied with bulk buying. As the buying quantity of the smart aluminum cans (with NFC chips) introduced by Orekin in 2023 crossed 50 million, the extra cost per can was just 0.02 US dollars. But the effectiveness of consumer interaction data collection rose by 40%, and the precision of marketing budgets enhanced by 30%. PepsiCo deployed the Ardagh Metal Packaging laser engraving technology and distributed the mold development cost across volume procurement of wholesale aluminum cans. The cost of printing per can was reduced by 0.005 US dollars, and the yearly ink cost was saved to the tune of 3.5 million US dollars. In addition, the production lines whose recycled aluminum proportion has been increased to 60% (e.g., Coca-Cola European factories) can reduce smelting energy consumption by 95%, while the production cost per ton of aluminum material has dropped from 2,800 US dollars to 1,350 US dollars.

Risk hedging and price stabilizing via long-term contracts. Bulk purchases usually incorporate price lock-in terms. For instance, in 2020 Red Bull signed a five-year wholesale aluminium cans agreement with Norbelis to prevent the possibility of 76% hikes in aluminium prices in 2022 and keep over 230 million US dollars in expenses. According to the estimate of Boston Consulting Group, the volatility (standard deviation) of raw material prices of firms that apply long-term contracts can be reduced from ±18% to ±6%, and the budgeting error rate of products can be squeezed into 3%. Meanwhile, the number of suppliers (Mengniu, for instance, consolidated its suppliers of aluminum cans from 12 to 4) is reduced, the cost of quality checks by 35%, the responsiveness of collaborative innovation speed among the suppliers by 50%, and reduces the product launch cycle time by 25%.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Shopping Cart